Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1991 (4) TMI 416

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessing authority in the original assessment exempted a turnover of Rs. 1,39,658.98 from the purview of sales tax holding the turnover as not exigible to tax since it did not represent sale but only service. This view was taken by the assessing authority in view of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Northern India Caterers (India) Ltd. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi [1978] 42 STC 386. It t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the judgment of the Supreme Court in Northern India Caterers (India) Ltd. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi [1980] 45 STC 212 and it was argued that there was no sale of food and that service is the dominant object of the transactions in the respondents' Bhavan and, therefore, the turnover was not exigible to tax. The appellate authority, however, found that there was sale of food which was predominant o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... or the other as to what was the substance of the transaction and dominant object of the same, it should have remitted the matter to the assessing authority for investigation on the question of fact since it had been observed in Northern India Caterers (India) Ltd. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi [1980] 45 STC 212 (SC) that this question of fact should be decided in each case with reference to nature and....