TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1993 (3) TMI 331
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....and the consequent demand is exhibit P1(a). The passing of the order exhibit P1 was preceded by a notice exhibit P2 in which certain allegations were made against the petitioner. The gravamen of the allegations was that despatches of petroleum products by the petitioner to the two purchasers in Mahe, namely, Mahe Beach Trading Co. and Surya Service Station, Palloor, were actually diverted to stations in Kerala without being delivered at destination. 2.. In support of this notice, it was mentioned, inter alia, that the form 1-A vehicle check register maintained at the check-post Azhiyoor Chungam for the period March 1, 1991 to November 30, 1991, did not contain entries relating to these transports. Secondly it was stated that no seal of t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hem did not pertain to their despatches. I am not entering into greater detail of the averments made in the objections as the matter is now pending with the Deputy Commissioner in an application filed under section 45A(3) of the Act and that authority will have to deal with the matter in all its aspects. It will not be proper for this Court at this stage to make any observations regarding the merits of the controversy. 4.. Overruling the objections contained in exhibit P3, the first respondent levied a penalty of rupees thirty lakhs under section 45A(1)(b) for not maintaining true and correct accounts. This order was challenged before the second respondent, Deputy Commissioner, by filing an application under section 45A(3) of the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... that the authority dealing with an application for stay of this nature must bear in mind the principles laid down in the aforesaid decisions while passing the order. Any failure to keep those guidelines in mind while exercising the discretion will amount to non-exercise of the discretion in the eye of law liable to be interfered with tinder article 226 of the Constitution of India. This Court said that to decide as to whether the appellant has made out a prima facie case, as against a frivolous one, the appellate or the revisional authority should look into the questions that are involved in the appeal or revision. This should not be done in a mechanical manner, but objectively and with reference to the facts and circumstances of the case.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t is conferred. In that view of the matter, the learned Judge quashed the order which is quoted in paragraph 3 of the judgment. 7.. The question is whether exhibit P5 is liable to be interfered with by this Court, in the exercise of its jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution. In this connection, I must mention here that this Court will not normally exercise its discretion to interfere with an interlocutory order unless the order is one passed perversely, or is one passed without adverting to relevant facts and circumstances of the case, or one which is based on irrelevant circumstances. Exhibit P5 is liable to be tested on these factors. 8.. It will be seen from a perusal of exhibits P3 and P4 that serious objections have ....