1991 (7) TMI 349

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ase of Mod. Serajuddin [1975] 36 STC 136 (SC); 1975 UPTC 482 (SC) transaction in question is not being treated as a transaction in the course of export, even though earlier the respondents-authority also were treating it to be so. After the decision the respondents started proceeding for levying tax under the relevant provision of the Acts. The dealers in order to salvage from the onerous liability likely to be fastened on them approached the Central Government through representation for redress. The representations were also by different associations of exporters. In consequence thereof the Central Government amended the relevant provision through Act No. 103 of 1976 amending section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 by adding subsectio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ign buyer of Moscow, on account of the belief, both of the petitioners and respondent-authority was exempt and thus he did not deposit tax initially, as the petitioner felt no liability of purchase tax on such supply for the proposed export in view of the law as understood then. After passing the assessment order for 1974-75 on 25th October, 1978, the petitioner approached the respondent for granting remission of purchase tax and since this did not materialise, having no option he deposited the entire purchase tax as assessed. It is thereafter a demand has been raised by passing order under section 8(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act imposing interest on the said amount of purchase tax totalling Rs. 32,125.92 with effect from 1st June, 1975. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....wara State Trading Corporation ki ki gai un juto ki bikri par jo corporation dwara duso re desho ko niryat kiye gaye hai vidhwat dei pradeshiya tatha kendrea bikri kar ki rashi maf kar diye jai sath hi asse dei rashi byaj tatha asropith arthdandh yadi koi ho..................." It is true in the subject of the said letter as quoted above, this referred to exemption of sales tax on the footwears exported to other countries. The word used therein of granting exemption of sales tax is broadly used. However, the language used in the said circular is not confined to exemption from sales tax only, but clearly speaks of granting exemption to such dealers on the tax payable by them either in the U.P. or under the Central Sales Tax Act where foot....