Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1992 (8) TMI 253

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... carrying on business in chemicals, namely, anhydrous ammonia. It sells the product to various industrial units in the State like H.M.T., Widia (India), rubber industries, dairies and ice manufacturing units. For the assessment year 1981-82 the Commercial Tax Officer determined the assessee's taxable turnover at Rs. 15,00,411.16 and levied tax at 8 per cent under entry No. 79 of the Second Schedule, treating the product as a chemical. Subsequently, the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes initiated suo motu proceedings under section 21(2) of the Act, proposing to levy tax at 10 per cent under entry No. 121 of the Second Schedule, treating the product as "industrial gas". Accepting the contention that since the company had sold anhydrous ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... contrary Sri Dattu, learned Government Advocate, submits that the very fact that the product was sold to various industrial units for industrial purpose and used as industrial gas, the commodity squarely comes within the purview of entry No. 121, and it is taxable as such. 5.. In Porritts & Spencer (Asia) Ltd. v. State of Haryana [1978] 42 STC 433, while interpreting the word "textiles" in item 30 of Schedule B to the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, the Supreme Court has held that the word must be interpreted according to its popular sense; meaning, that sense which people conversant with the subject-matter with which the statute is dealing would attribute to it. 6.. In Bishambar Dayal Shri Niwas v. Commissioner of Sales Tax [196....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pted. Though there is no equity in the taxing statute, the rule of interpretation that in the matter of competing interests, a citizen should be given the benefit as against the State is not excluded. The same idea is conveyed when it is said that if an article is to be taxed and the said article may fall within two entries, the entry which is more beneficial to the assessee will have to be accepted as applicable to the article in question." 8.. In Commissioner, Sales Tax v. Prayag Chemical Works [1970] 25 STC 85 (All.) [FB], an identical entry in the U.P. Sales Tax Act, namely, "chemicals of all kinds" came up for interpretation. R.S. Pathak, J. (as he then was), has held that whether a commodity can be described as a "chemical" for the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the commodity it is clear that it is put to various uses. In its liquid form it can be used as a fertilizer directly on the soil. It may also be used, after necessary processing, in the gaseous form for certain purposes. One thing appears to be clear that in its soluble form and the subsequent storage, it is essentially a chemical in the liquid form and sold as such, notwithstanding the specific user (which is not clear in this case) by the purchasers which are industrial units. 11.. Sri Dattu, however, strongly relied upon the decision of this Court in Rao and Company v. State of Karnataka [1981] 47 STC 421. The question that arose for consideration in that case was whether "carbon dioxide" is "industrial gas" falling under entry No.....