Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1990 (11) TMI 368

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of bituminised or wax coated waterproof paper, as per section 3(2) read with item 117 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). 2.. The assessee purchased paper from the Seshasayee Paper and Boards Limited, paying sales tax as per the same entry 117 and converted the said paper into waterproof paper by coating bitumen or wax between two sheets of paper and sold it. The assessee's contention is that the sale of the abovesaid bituminised or wax coated paper was only a second sale of paper and could not be taxed once again. But the Board of Revenue held as follows: "Inasmuch as the product purchased by the assessee had undergone a change and is known and understood as a di....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... his abovesaid two submissions, we find that the above referred to [1980] TLNJ 393 (Kwality Coated Products v. Government of India), is a decision relating to levy of excise duty and that the question there was whether there was "manufacture" within the meaning of excise law, when paper was converted into such bituminised waterproof paper. It was no doubt held there, that there was no manufacture involved in the said process relying on the following passage in South Bihar Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Union of India AIR 1968 SC 922: "The word 'manufacture' implies a change but every change in the raw material is not manufacture. There must be such a transformation that a new and different article must emerge having a distinctive name, character or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Supreme Court also observed at page 325 as follows: "As we all know, sales tax law is intended to tax sales of different commercial commodities and not to tax the production or manufacture of particular substances out of which these commodities may have been made. As soon as separate commercial commodities emerge or come into existence, they become separately taxable goods or entities for purposes of sales tax. Where commercial goods, without change of their identity as such goods, are merely subjected to some processing or finishing or are merely joined together, they may remain commercially the goods which cannot be taxed again, in a series of sales, so long as they retain their identity as goods of a particular type. " 5.. No doubt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....meaning of item (xi) specified in section 14(iv) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and that they are, therefore, "declared goods" and are not liable to additional sales tax and surcharge under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. There, the Supreme Court has observed as follows: "The purpose of galvanising a steel pipe is merely to make it weatherproof. It remains a steel tube. By being put through the process of galvanising it is made rust-proof. The limited purpose of galvanisation does not bring a new commodity into existence. Neither its structure nor function is altered. As a commercial item it is not different from a steel tube." In deciding the said case, dealing with the abovesaid [1980] 46 STC 22 (Mad.) (Deputy Commissioner ....