Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1988 (7) TMI 393

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., 1987 passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal upholding the demand of security under section 13-A(6) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. Nobody appears for the assessee. Learned Standing Counsel, appearing for the Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P., has been heard. The facts, briefly stated, are that the assessee is a manufacturer of T.V. sets carrying on its business at Ghaziabad and has its branch office at De....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... held that the authority seizing the goods was justified in demanding security. The first appeal preferred by the assessee was also dismissed. Consequently a second appeal was filed and that too has been dismissed by the impugned order passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal. Aggrieved against the same the present revision has been preferred. On consideration of submissions made by the learned counsel....