1986 (5) TMI 260
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ected against an order passed by the learned single judge in Civil Suit No. 1402 of 1982. The suit is for recovery of price of the goods and in the suit amount is included a sum of Rs. 5,44,925 which is stated to be due from the first defendant in lieu of ST-1 forms. The application which has led to the order under challenge being passed was moved with the idea of getting ST-1 forms from the defen....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ge was of the view that the delivery of ST-1 forms would be advantageous to both the parties. It would reduce the taxable liability of the plaintiff qua the sales tax order and it would reduce the defendant's liability in the suit to the extent of the claim qua the ST-1 forms. In appeal, it was urged that the learned court had no jurisdiction to pass the order regarding the delivery of ST-1 for....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fit to both the parties. We fail to understand why the defendant has appealed. There is no specification or decision of the liability of the first defendant qua the goods by this order. In any event, whatever the situation might have been the necessary forms had to be delivered to the plaintiff. It is also urged by the counsel for the appellant that the forms are not to be delivered to the plainti....
TaxTMI