Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1987 (2) TMI 483

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., 1954, as amended by the Amendment Act of 1984. The question of law referred for the decision of this Court, is the following: "Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Board of Revenue was justified in holding that the containers were not taxable without considering whether there was implied sale or not?" The assessee was a dealer carrying on business of manufacture and sal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nuff sold had been packed. The department being aggrieved by this decision, went to the Board of Revenue, which held that the goods sold, namely, snuff, being exempt from tax, its packing material, i.e., tin containers, for which, no separate charge was levied, were also exempt from tax in accordance with the last proviso to sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. The re....