Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1985 (2) TMI 235

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Bench II, Aligarh, dated 20th June, 1984, relating to assessment year 1977-78 dismissing its appeal. The short question involved in the instant revision is that the appeal of the assessee has been rejected by the first appellate authority on the ground that no admitted tax was deposited by it. The Tribunal in the second appeal has also endorsed the view taken by the lower appellate authority. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to believe that the evidence filed before him could not be filed before the Sales Tax Officer. Circumstances of the case are such that it cannot be said that the assessee could reasonably dispute the liability of tax and as such it is desirable that the appeal of the assessee should be heard on merit instead of rejecting it on technical ground. In the result the revision succeeds and is allowe....