Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (12) TMI 756

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. ORDER Ld. Counsel for appellants submits that refund of Rs. 2,22,105/-, Rs. 26,832/- and Rs. 1,47,738/- aggregating to Rs. 3,96,675/- was admissible to appellants and that was directed by learned adjudicating authority in terms of Order dated 11-7-2008 on convincing grounds. The first appellate authority allowed the appeal of Revenue in terms Order dated 26-2-2009 for no good reason. Whil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Rs. 1,47,738/-. He also agrees that a copy of balance sheet is available at page 63 of the appeal record depicting the amount of Rs. 3,96,681/-. But he supports the reasoning of the Commissioner (Appeals) for the order passed. 3. Heard both sides and perused the records. 4. There is no disagreement that the material portion of records has been perused by both sides today to the extent stated....