Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (1) TMI 1021

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant. Shri S.S. Katiyar, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER M/s. Ubique Alloys Pvt. Ltd. and the Director Shri Prakash M. Jain are in appeal against the order wherein penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs each have been imposed on them. In this case some steel pipes were sent by a Chinese exporter in the name of M/s. Ubique Alloys Pvt. Ltd. and subsequently bill of entry were filed by M/s. Keystone Inc. fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....scription of stainless steel pipes, indulged in undervaluation of goods and also obtained manipulated amended bills of lading resulting in evasion of Customs duty. It was submitted that merely because he had issued NOC, penalty could not imposed. 4. The learned DR on the other hand submits that as observed by the Commissioner in his order, the appellants in this case allowed use of the company ....