Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1980 (7) TMI 245

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nces of the case, the Additional Tribunal was correct in upholding the assessment without a specific finding that silk articles dealt in by the petitioner were valued more than Rs. 10 a piece? (iii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Additional Tribunal was correct in upholding the assessment of tax on tasar, kantia and matha dealt in by the assessee?" 2.. The assessee carries on business in handloom cloth, sarees including silk, tasar and matha goods. Its principal place of business is at Puri and there is a branch at Cuttack. The Cuttack branch is separately registered and bears registration mark CUIW 740. The relevant period is 1971-72. The petitioner returned a gross turnover of Rs. 3,51,149.96, but sh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... urged on behalf of the appellant that 'khadi' has been defined under the Khadi and Village Industries Act to be handspun and handwoven. It has further been defined that handspun and handwoven woollen and silken materials are also khadi. In view of these definitions of the Khadi Act, the goods dealt in by the appellant being both handspun and handwoven, the forums below should have treated these materials to come under the purview of entry No. 24 of the tax-free list. I may say that it is true that the definition of the Khadi Act supports the contention of the appellant. But the said reasoning cannot apply while considering the taxability of the articles dealt in by the appellant. Entry No. 8 of the taxable list of goods other than luxury g....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and spun silk yarn. khadi handloom woven cloth and khadi ready-made garments. Serial No. 8 in clear terms makes provision for all silk goods. To avoid ambiguity, it specifically brings into its fold what is excepted in serial No. 19. There is force in the submission of the learned standing counsel that it had never been intended that silk goods of whatever origin was to be exempted from tax. If that were so, keeping the manner in which provision was made in serial No. 9 above in view, the learned standing counsel contends that in serial No. 24 an inclusive provision could have been indicated to cover handwoven silk. Silk yarn is made liable to tax, but handspun silk yarn has been exempted. The assessee's counsel has strenuously conte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd really referred to charkha spun material. Reliance is placed on the existing entry No. 19, which provides: "Khadi cloth of all kinds including pure silk cloth, khadi woollen goods and handspun yarn sold by dealers duly certified by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission or Akhil Bharatiya Charkha Sangh." The language of the present entry makes it obviously clear that the intention was that all kinds of khadi cloth were to be exempted from tax and khadi had been used to connote the manufacturing process, i. e., handspun yarn and handwoven cloth. We have been asked to take note of the fact that entry No. 19 was suitably amended as the authorities under the statute did not give effect to the intention of the State Government. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e to the statutory definition of "khadi " had been placed before us and merely by looking into the two entries, we had come to hold that khadi silk fell under serial No. 8. At one point of time we were thinking that the matter should be referred to a larger Bench and we should not take upon us the responsibility of distinguishing our earlier decision. But we are impressed with the argument that the statutory definitions in the three Central Acts preceding the notification in question had not been placed before us on the earlier occasion and there has been no analysis of the respective entries to find out the ambit of inclusion and the purview of exclusion. In the circumstances, we do not think there is any necessity of referring the matter ....