2010 (3) TMI 963

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Saharan, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER These three appeals are by the Department arising out of common order-in-appeal No. 140-144/CE/CHD/2008, dated 15-2-2008 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). There are other parties aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and their appeals are not being dealt with in this order. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The relevant facts in Ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....led bars weighing 16.885 MT against the opening balance of 220.870 MT and no reason could be given by the partner. The duty involved amounting to Rs. 44,250/- was debited on 27-9-2003. The original authority confirmed the demand of duty and imposed 44,250/- as penalty on the respondent firm under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules and also penalty of Rs. 44,250/- on Shri Naresh Joshi partner unde....