Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (1) TMI 822

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment pleader appearing for the respondent. During the accounting year relevant for the assessment year 1996-97, the assessee invested Rs. 68 lakhs towards equity in a company by name Confoams Ltd. which set up a new industrial unit for centrifuging rubber latex. The agricultural income of the assessee computed for the relevant assessment year without deduction under section 9(4) was Rs. 39,67,570, whereas the investment by the assessee in the equity of the company which started new industrial undertaking during the previous year in respect of which 50 per cent. of the claim was made under section 9(4) was Rs. 68 lakhs. While completing the assessment, the Assessing Officer disallowed deduction claimed under section 9(4) of the Act on two....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hall not exceed the total agricultural income in the previous year of that company, computed without deduction provided under this sub-section or rupees one crore, whichever is less, provided (i) such investment is not in plantation industry or agricultural activities ancillary thereto which is directly a downstream industry of the produce of that plantation ; (ii) the amount invested is fully utilised within the State within a period of three years from the date of investment or before the commencement of commercial production of such industrial undertaking, whichever is earlier ; and (iii) there is no transfer of investment within a period of five years of such investment." Sub-section (4) first introduced with effect from April ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....downstream industry of the produce of the assessee's plantation is not entitled for the benefit of deduction. The amended provision provides in the first proviso to section 9(4) that investment in the plantation industry or in an industry engaged in agricultural activities auxiliary to the plantation industry does not qualify for deduction. The agricultural activity auxiliary to the plantation industry need not always be an industrial activity and in order to clarify what is the agricultural activity auxiliary to the plantation industry that is disqualified from the benefit, the amendment is introduced which makes it clear that a downstream industry of the produce of the plantation of the assessee is not entitled to benefit. The assessee is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ore, even without the amendment, the industry, centrifuging field latex in which the assessee made the investment does not qualify for the benefit of deduction made by the investor as it is only processing the produce of plantation industry. Further, we find that the purpose of section 9(4) is not to give benefit on additional investments made by the plantation in the allied industries for processing of its produce. What the Legislature intends is investment in other industries unconnected with plantation or its produce to promote industrial growth. We are, therefore, of the view that investment in the industry engaged in centrifuging of field latex is not entitled for deduction under section 9(4) of the Act. We, therefore, uphold the order....