Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (1) TMI 990

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssioner (Appeals) No. 82/Cus/ANL/2009 dated 27-5-2009. 2. None appears for the appellant in spite of notice. On earlier occasions (on 21-12-2009 and 12-11-2009), also none appeared in spite of notice. Heard the ld. SDR and perused the records. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are that 14700 Kgs. of Indian wheat valued Rs. 1,47,000/- in 176 bags was found very close to Nepal Border and seized and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f appeal. It is not being disputed that Indian wheat was stored at a place, which was only 200-300 Mtrs. from Nepal Border. Shri Suresh Kumar Gupta has clearly admitted that the goods were meant for illegal export through unauthorised route. Therefore, the goods have been rightly held liable for confiscation. However, neither show cause notice nor the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) indicate a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....om whose possession or custody such goods have been seized,] an option to pay in lieu of confiscation such fine as the said officer thinks fit : Provided that, without prejudice to the provisions of the proviso to sub­section (2) of Section 115, such fine shall not exceed the market price of the goods confiscated, less in the case of imported goods the duty chargeable thereon. 5. Under these....