Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1978 (3) TMI 195

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed sales within the meaning of the Indian Sale of Goods Act and the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. (2) Whether or not sales of unserviceable goods, scraps, discarded and surplus materials were exigible to tax under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, in view of the incorporation of the definition of "business" by an Ordinance promulgated in 1967 (since repealed and saved by West Bengal Act 25 of 1969), the retrospective operation of which was struck down by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Shew Bhagwan Goenka v. Commercial Tax Officer[1973] 32 S.T.C. 368. The facts found and/or admitted are as follows: The assessee is a British company. It was engaged as a constituent of a consortium known as INCON. The consortium e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urnover of the assessee. Disposal of surplus stores was, however, held to be part of its turnover. A revision was preferred to the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, West Bengal, from the order of the Assistant Commissioner. The Additional Commissioner upheld the decision of the Commercial Tax Officer in its entirety, on the basis of the extended definition of the expression "business" in the statute with retrospective effect. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed further revisions before the Member, Board of Revenue, West Bengal. The Board upheld the contentions of the authorities below. The Member considered a judgment of this court in the case of Shew Bhagwan Goenka v. Commercial Tax Officer[1973] 32 S.T.C. 368. , where it ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in question was a sale within the meaning of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, and, therefore, he was entitled to agitate that a sale within the meaning of the Sales Tax Act must be a sale by a dealer. We are unable to agree with Mr. Dutt. Sale has been defined both in the Indian Sale of Goods Act and in the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The definition in section 2(g) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act is as follows: "2. (g) 'sale' means any transfer of property in goods for cash or deferred payment or other valuable consideration, including a transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of a contract, but does not include a mortgage, hypothecation, charge or pledge." Indian Sale of Goods Act defines a c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....w India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Esplanade Division, Madras[1972] 29 S.T.C. 539., (h) Chief Commercial Superintendent, South Eastern Railway v. Member, Board of Revenue, West Bengal[1973] 32 S.T.C. 171., (i) Board of Revenue v. A.M. Ansari[1976] 38 S.T.C. 577 (S.C.)., (j) Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Mysore[1975] 101 I.T.R. 234 (S.C.); A.I.R. 1976 On question No. (2), Mr. Dutt contended that in any event it has not been found that the assessee was carrying on business as a dealer of rejected and unserviceable goods, scraps and discarded materials and, therefore, could not be held to be liable to pay sales tax on such sales. In support of his contention, Mr. Dutt cited a dec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ther that so far as the fixed assets and surplus materials are concerned, the Assistant Commissioner had granted relief to the assessee. The Additional Commissioner proceeded on the basis of the definition of "business" as introduced retrospectively in the statute and, therefore, this relief granted to the assessee was withdrawn. The retrospective operation of the definition having been struck down by this court, the Member ought not to have withheld the relief claimed. The decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Shew Bhagwan Goenka[1973] 32 S.T.C. 368. has been approved subsequently in another Division Bench of this Court in Bengal Paper Mill Co. Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer[1976] 38 S.T.C. 163; 80 C.W.N. 582.  Therefore,....