2009 (9) TMI 799
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....S. Venkatagiri, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER Heard both sides. 2. In this case the appellants (sic) respondents supplied raw materials and got the impugned goods manufactured by the job worker. Admittedly the job worker did not pay the duty and the appellants (sic) respondents have paid the duty on the impugned goods. It is the department's case that since the duty has been paid by....
TaxTMI