Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (9) TMI 772

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Soni, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER Heard at length the learned advocate for the applicant and learned DR. This is an application for recall of the order dated 20-4-09 passed in Rectification Application No. 55/2008 in C.E. [2009 (238) E.L.T. 466 (Tri. - Del.)] Appeal No. 3040/04 and for restoration of said Rectification Application No. 55/08 for hearing on merits. 2. It is the case of the ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....storing the application for rectification. It is his further case that there was no attempt on the part of the applicant to delay the proceedings and he is certainly interested in pursuing with the matter. The learned advocate for the applicant while arguing the matter submitted that he was under the impression that the matter was adjourned to 24-4-09 from 6-3-09 as 24-4-09 happened to be Friday a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l, 2009, the application presented by the advocate on behalf of the applicant was rejected and the rectification application No. 55/08 was dismissed. It is true that order discloses the date of 20-4-09, which was obviously a typing mistake. We have perused the cause list of 22-4-09 and it clearly shows that the Rectification Application No. 55/08 was listed for hearing on 22-4-09 and not on 20-4-0....