Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (8) TMI 987

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Raja Ram, JDR, for the Respondent. ORDER This miscellaneous application is filed by the applicant for implementation of our Final Order No. 296 & 297/2003 dated 28-2-2003, vide which we had allowed the appeal filed by the applicant/appellant with consequential relief/relies of the goods which were seized and lying with the Departmental authorities. 2. When the matter was listed on 13-8-2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nst O-I-O No. 60/99 dated 21-9-1999-Reg. Please refer to your letter No. C/414 & 415/2009 dated 13-8-2009 on the above subject. The appellant had inspected the goods on 2-4-09. The department had preferred an appeal against the Final Order No. 296 and 297/2003 dated 28-2-03. Which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide C.P No. 1478 of 2003 dated 22-10-07. Subsequently, the department vide re....