2009 (7) TMI 1104

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Respondent. ORDER Heard both sides. The appellant filed this appeal against the impugned order whereby a penalty of 1,00,000/- (approx.) was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). 2. Brief facts of the case are that on 4-11-06 at around 1 AM, the Customs Officers intercepted a Thela carrying 768 kgs. of red sanders wood at the border of Nepal. The Thela accompanied by a person on motorcycl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e present appellant. 4. The contention of the appellant is that he is not anywhere concerned with the impugned goods. The present appellant asked for cross-examination of the employee of the Transport Company, who named the appellant and the same was denied. There is no evidence on record to show that the appellant is anywhere concerned with the impugned goods. The appellant also relied upon th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order held that the show-cause notice was issued on the basis of circumstantial evidence and statement of employee of the Transport Company. The appellant requested for cross-examination and employee of the Transport Company who named appellant and the same was denied by the adjudicating authority. The only evidence against the appellant is that in the ....