Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1977 (6) TMI 92

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd November, 1971, and 31st March, 1972, is relevant for consideration. The assessing authority fixed the turnover for that period at Rs. 46,986.55 and in addition levied a penalty of Rs. 1,515. On appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner while confirming the assessment reduced the penalty to Rs. 909. Thereafter, there was an appeal to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. Three contentions were taken before the Tribunal. The first was that the addition to the book turnover was not proper. The Tribunal went into this question and found that the defects pointed out by the assessing authority existed so that the addition was liable to be made. The second contention taken before the Tribunal was that the assessee was eligible to be assessed at....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ard with the present revision petition challenging the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The first objection to the order of the Tribunal is that as regards the benefit of the assessment under section 7 given by the Tribunal by its order. The learned Additional Government Pleader contended that the provisions of section 7(2A) relied on by the Tribunal did not justify the granting of the benefit of section 7 for the year preceding that for which the assessment was made on 13th June, 1972. As mentioned earlier, the assessment was made on 13th June, 1972, for the assessment year 1972-73. According to the Additional Government Pleader, the benefit of section 7, which was given to the assessee under the said order, could not be taken....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ler is eligible to be assessed under this section" would comprehend all assessments made subsequent to the granting of the permission for any year. It is in this view that though the permission was granted for the assessment year 1972-73 on 13th June, 1972, it was held to enure for the assessment year 1971-72 also for which the assessment was completed subsequently. A careful consideration of rule 15(4A) and section 7(2A) would, in our opinion, go to show that the grant of permission by the assessing authority under section 7(2) would continue to be in force only to assessment years subsequent to that for which the permission was granted. It would not, in our opinion, be proper or reasonable to consider that the benefit of section 7, when o....