2009 (8) TMI 967

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Respondent. ORDER Ld. Authorised Representative Shri Amit Agarwal submits that the appellant has already paid the service tax amount of Rs. 66,64,246/- for which the stay application is to stay realization of the penalty of the same amount and the interest. Shri Agarwal submits that there was only delay in making payment of the service tax. But there was no intention for suppression ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t disputed the tax liability. In absence of that, in para 16, when the investigation brought the appellant to the charges of suppression that was enough to penalise the appellant to the extent of service tax demand. Even in para 17, Ld. Commissioner has analysed the fact and found defiance of law. 5. In view of above specific findings in adjudication and considering that the matter requires tho....