2009 (5) TMI 837

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Advocate with Ms. Sarita Ravina, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Sumit Kumar, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER Ld. Sr. Counsel Shri J.F. Pochkhanawala very fairly submits that the proposition of levy is not disputed. But the basis of levy is disputed for many reasons. But to reduce the litigation the appellant itself has come forward to make deposit of 80% of the demand in question. There....