Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (1) TMI 735

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DR, for the Responent. ORDER Under an agreement entered with M/s. Indco Serve, Conoor the appellants herein M/s. Pearl Packaging, Conoor blended and packed tea for M/s. Indco Serve during the period 10-9-2004 to 28-2-2005. Adjudicating a show-cause notice served on M/s. Pearl Packaging, the original authority demanded an amount of Rs. 2,55,354/- being the service tax found to have been payab....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es this order. Applications filed for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery to hear these appeals arise before me today. 2. After hearing both sides I find that the appellants have already paid the service tax demanded in the order impugned in Appeal No. S/245/2008. As regards the other application I find that the Order-in-Revision was passed imposing penalty on the appellants for not disc....