2009 (9) TMI 719

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... DR, for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant has come in appeal with delay of 73 days. Both the appeals are supported by two Misc. applications for condoning delay. The order in appeal was received by them on 3-1-2009. Three months period expired on 2nd April, 2009. Paragraph 3 of Misc. Application indicates that 10 days prior to limitation, Shri R.K. Arora who is manager of the applicant re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of its right either before limitation or after limitation. Thus an indolent does not deserve any consideration for preferring a belated appeal which otherwise is abuse of process of law. The appellant has also not explained in the application whether the delay was bona fide and not deliberate. While considering the matter, we were not at all concerned with the length of delay but were concerned wi....