Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (12) TMI 629

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....K. Anand, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President]. - The Revenue is aggrieved by the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) holding that waste and scrap arising in the course of manufacture of cycle parts exported and for which rebate was granted in terms of Notification No. 41/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001, was not liable to pay duty for the reason that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(N.T.) to the availment of benefit to waste and scrap under any other Notification. In this case, there is no dispute that the assessees' value of clearances during the years in question was below the ceiling limit prescribed in the SSI exemption Notification and further, as pointed out in the cross-objection by the assessees, benefit of Notification No. 89/95-C.E., dated 18-5-1995 granting exempt....