2009 (3) TMI 861

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 433 of 1988 titled Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Haryana Biological (P.) Ltd. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent filed a petition under section 75 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short, "the Act"), challenging the demand raised by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (for short, "the Corporation") for the period from 4/1983 to 11/1983 and also prayed for restraining the appellant /Corporation from recovering Rs. 5,636 being contribution for the said period. In the petition, it was alleged by the respondent that the respondent is carrying on the manufacturing process of pharmaceuticals. Vide letter dated January 25, 1979, they were informed by the appellant that their factory h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1998] 1 SCC 86. It is submitted that in the aforesaid case, the apex court concluded that even the managing director of a company is an employee of the company within the definition of section 2(9) of the Act. 6. In the case of Employees' State Insurance Corporation [1998] 1 SCC 86, the company was engaged in the manufacturing of motor seats. On September 9, 1969, the board of directors of the company resolved to elect one of the directors Shri V. N. Dhanwate as managing director of the company and also conferred on him the authority to borrow, invest and lend the funds with certain limitation specified in the resolution. The board of directors of the Corporation vide its resolution dated May 23, 1974, informed the company that Shri Dhanwa....