TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (4) TMI 764
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lant. Shri Ameet Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent. Shri R. Parthsarthy, Ms. Reena Khair and Rajesh Sharma, Advocates, for the Interested Parties. [Order per : Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar, President (Oral)]. - We have heard at length the learned Advocate for the applicant and the Advocate for the respondent Nos. 2, 19, 20 and 32. None has appeared for other respondents including the responde....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of Synthetic Fibre Industry v. J.K. Industries Ltd. reported in 2006 (199) E.L.T. 196 as also the various provisions of law attracted in the matter in hand. It is not necessary to reproduce all the contentions advanced by the advocates and suffice to record that both the parties in the course of hearing prayed for early disposal of the appeal itself while submitting that the same would be in the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n appeals on the same line as was directed by the High Court of Delhi under order dated 28th January, 2009 in Writ Petition No. 8459/08. 4. Before we part with the matter, it is necessary to express our displeasure for failure on the part of the respondent No. 1 to appear before the Tribunal and to assist the Tribunal in the matter. It is most unfortunate that the Department which is concern....