Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (6) TMI 821

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lani, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri S.S. Katiyar, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar, President]. -  Heard the learned Advocate for the applicants and learned DR for the respondent. 2. It has been strenuously argued by the learned Advocate for the applicants that the transaction value has not been determined in terms of Rule 5 of the Customs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Co. were from China, the country from where the goods in question were imported by the applicants. 3. The attention of the Bench was drawn to the decisions of the Tribunal in the matter of Bayer India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai, 2006 (198) E.L.T. 240 and BE Office Automation (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai, 2004 (171) E.L.T. 460; as well as the decision of the Ape....