Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (5) TMI 791

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri V.V. Hariharan, JCDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P. Karthikeyan, Member (T)]. - This is a ROM petition filed by M/s. Mayilmark Nilayam, seeking rectification of errors apparent front the records contained in our Final Order No. 232-238/09, dated 5-3-09 [2009 (241) E.L.T. 422 (Tri.)]. Adjudicating various proposals, inter alia, to classify 'Shikakai powder' manufactured by the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ikakai powder under CSH 3305.90 following the judgment of the Apex Court in Sree Ramakrishna Soapnut Works v. Superintendent of Central Excise - 2007 (210) E.L.T. 332 (S.C.), the demand was restricted to normal period. Penalties imposed on the applicants were vacated except that on account of the confiscation of the seized goods. In the application filed before the Tribunal, the applicant prays th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der CSH 3305.90. We are also in agreement with the applicant in their submission that fine and penalty also could not be ordered as there was no proposal to classify shikakai under CSH 3305.90 as decided by the Tribunal. Accordingly, we allow this ROM petition and modify paragraph 11 of our final order No. 232 to 238/2009 dated 5-3-09, which will now read as under :- 11. In the result we h....