2009 (4) TMI 747

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....[Order]. - Modvat credit of Rs. 1,43,162/- stands denied to the appellants on the ground that the invoices, on the basis of which the credit has been availed, were in the name of same appellant other unit i.e. unit No. II and Unit No. III. The demand stands confirmed by invoking extended period of limitation. 2. Shri P.M. Dave, ld. Advocate on behalf of the appellants submits that appellan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ground that the invoice was not in the name of the Unit-I whereas for confirmation of demand both the lower authorities have taken a stand that even though the claim by the appellants that the name of the unit was mentioned correctly and ECC number was wrongly mentioned, they have held that the appellants have failed to show that the inputs have not been received in the other units and not utiliz....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....it cannot be availed by Unit No. I; irrespective of the fact that the inputs were received by them. 4. After appreciating the submissions from both the sides, I find that the issue stands no more res integra. In the case of Larsen & Toubro v. Collector of Central Excise, Bhubaneswar [1994 (72) E.L.T. 948 (Tribunal)], it was held that duty paying documents showing address of other unit of the....