2009 (6) TMI 805

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Appellant. Shri S.S. Katiyar, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : A.K. Srivastava, Member (T)]. -  This stay application has been filed by M/s. Larsen & Toubro Limited, Mumbai (the applicants herein) against the Order-in-Original dated 12-12-2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II. The Commissioner, vide the impugned order, confirmed the duty of Rs. 5.52 l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....undertaken as a turnkey Project and is not chargeable to duty as per Boards' Section 37B order dated 15-1-2002. Having held so, he took up the excisability of the components fabricated at site that have gone into the Project. He observed that the applicants have entirely fabricated the Fired Heater at site as per BPCL's design and QA/inspection plan incorporated in the contract. He concluded that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ral Excise reported in 2000 (120) E.L.T. 273 (S.C.) and the Tribunal's Judgment in the case of S.S. Engineers v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune reported in 2008 (221) E.L.T. 54 (Tri.-Mumbai). We note that while the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Triveni Engineering and Industries deals with the excisability of turbo alternator, the Tribunal judgment in the case of S.S. Engineers Ltd. ....