Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (5) TMI 730

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant. Shri R.P. Meena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P. Karthikeyan, Member (T)]. - Vide the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) denied Modvat credit of Rs. 1,26,950/- availed by the appellants and ordered its recovery and sustained penalty of Rs. 25,000/- imposed by the original authority. The appellants M/s. Johnson Lifts Pvt. Ltd. had received in the months of May & Jun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....deemed credit would not be available to inputs received beyond 30-4-2000 when the notification ceased to be in operation. In the appeal filed before the Tribunal, the appellants have relied on MF (DR) Circular No. 522/18/2000-CX dt. 31-3-2000 which had communicated the decision of the Ministry to the effect that Cenvat credit would be allowed in respect of stocks of inputs which were lying with th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lants in respect of five invoices issued prior to 30-4-2000 under cover of which they had received re-rolled products etc. which were their inputs. Credit was denied on the sole ground that since the notification ceased to be in operation by 30-4-2000, the appellants were not eligible to the benefit of deemed credit in respect of inputs received beyond 30-4-2000. We find that the notification does....