TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (5) TMI 722
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., for the Appellant. Shri B.S. Suhag, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - Revenue has come with applications for rectification of the mistake apparent from the record. Both sides agree that applications for rectification were filed timely. Revenue has come out in these applications with these four proposals for rectification. (1) &nbs....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bsp; That in the 14th to 16th lines in Para 6 at Page 4 of the captioned order, it has been mentioned as under "The contention of the appellant is classifiable that "saunf ka ark" is under sub­heading 3303.31 of the Tariff". As such there appear some grammatical error in the sentence. (4) That in the 3rd and 4th lines of Para 9 page 6 of the captioned order, it was m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at there is a figure appearing as 3303.20 on 9th line in paragraph 2 of page 2. This relates to a sub-heading. Both sides suggest that appropriate sub-heading shall be 3003.20 we direct that the said sub-heading be read as 3003.20 instead of 3303.20. This disposes the second proposition of the miscellaneous application. (iii) So far as the third proposition is concerned. Both sides ....