Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (4) TMI 691

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. The appellants filed these two appeals against the impugned order whereby the scrap worth Rs. 4,33,195/- was confiscated and penalties were imposed on the ground that the scrap was of foreign origin and smuggled into India. 2. The contention of the appellants is that there is no evidence on record to show that the scrap in question i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the time of interception, the goods were not covered under any legal documents and the occupant of the truck admitted that the same is of Bangladesh origin. It is also submitted that there is no evidence on record regarding lawful possession of the goods. 4. Admittedly the facts are that the metal scrap is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962. Therefore, the onus is on ....