2009 (3) TMI 800

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri A.K. Sharma, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. -  Heard both sides. 2. Applicant filed an Application for early hearing of the Appeal. As the issue involved in this Appeal is covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Priya Blue Industries Ltd. v. CC (Prev.) - 2004 (172) E.L.T. 145 (S.C.) therefore the request for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur v. Flock (India) Pvt. Ltd. - 2000 (120) E.L.T. 285 (S.C.) = (2000) 6 Supreme Court Cases 650 and in the case of Priya Blue Industries Ltd. (supra). 5. In reply the contention of Appellant is that the facts of the present case are different from the facts of the case before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In the present case the assessment order was pas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efund was allowed. In the present case goods were assessed to duty and assessment order was passed and appropriate duty was paid. Thereafter the Appellant without challenging the assessment order filed the refund claim claiming the benefit of a Notification. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Flock (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Priya Blue Industries Ltd. (supra) held that the refund claim is not an ....