2009 (3) TMI 782

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Appellant. Shri U.K. Godbolay, Manager, for the Respondent. [Order per : A.K. Srivastava, Member (T)]. - This is an appeal filed by the Revenue. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. M/s. Maharashtra Scooter Ltd., Satara, the respondents (herein after referred to as assessee) are the manufacturer of two wheeler vehicle parts falling under C.S.H. No. 8211.00, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orge Ltd. - 2000 (122) E.L.T. 169 (T), allowed the appeal. 7. In the 'Grounds of Appeal', the Revenue has contended as under : (i)  A manufacturer cannot undertake any manufacturing activity of any product of the kind mentioned above without drawing/designs. The charges incurred on drawing/designs are directly connected with the production. Hon'ble CEGAT in Mipco Seamless Rings (Gu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p;We find that 17 show cause notices issued to the assessee during 1992 to 1999 purport to add 2% of the value of the goods as design and drawing charges and to recover duty on the additional added value. It is also seen that the price is agreed and contracted between the assessee and their customers. The assessee have not recovered anything over and above the price contracted. There is no allegat....