2009 (2) TMI 653

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri Sameer Chitkara, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of POY, which was being supplied by them to other 100% EOU as also was being sent to their job workers for conversion into texturised yarn. 2. The dispute in the present appeal is in respect of the National Calamity Contingency ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....et aside the demand of duty of Rs. 6,73,288/-. 3. Another demand of Rs. 10,39,624/- has been confirmed against the appellant as NCCD in respect of POY cleared to their job workers. The appellant is not contesting the said demand, but submits that the non-payment of the same has occurred on account of the fact that the appellant was, prior to the period in question, paying NCCD on the final....