2009 (2) TMI 641
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. Shri K.P. Singh, learned Departmental Representative (SDR) arguing on behalf of the Department challenges the impugned order passed by the lower appellate Authority on the ground that the said order merely quotes several case laws but does not discuss the facts of the present case and how those case laws are applicable to the present case.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....also states that these goods are regularly imported by M/s. Jewel Polymers who have sold the same to M/s. Balaji Plastics and that it is possible that the impugned goods are related to some earlier imports covered by different Bills of Entries. He states that a plea was made before the original Authority to further enquire the matter from M/s. Jewel Polymers but the same has not been done to come ....
TaxTMI