2009 (1) TMI 614

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri A.K. Sharma, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. 2. Shri N.K. Chaudhary, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellants states that the impugned Show Cause Notice was issued for recovery of amount under Section 11D of Central Excise Rules, 1944 (sic) (Act, 1944). The impugned order in original does not cite the Section under which the confirmation has been made but r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... have recovered the higher price from the customers. 4. After considering the submissions from both sides, I find that the order in original merely confirms the demand of Central Excise Duty amounting to Rs. 1,04,107/- as per the details given in the Show Cause Notice and records that since the appellants had already deposited the amount, the same is ordered to be appropriated. In the Show....