2008 (10) TMI 541
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cates, for the Appellant. Shri V.P.C. Rao, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - The appellant is required to pre-deposit an amount of Rs. 17,79,537/- being duty confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the appeal filed by the Revenue by setting aside the Order-in-Original No. 9/2005 dated 30-1-2006 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Central Excise, Calicut,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... total limit of Rs. 25 lakhs. Therefore the duty is demandable. The Commissioner (Appeals) has taken the view for confirmation of demand that total clearance of all the goods cleared by the appellants from all the job workers would be chargeable to duty. The Notification No. 05/2003-C.E., dated 30-6-2003 grants exemption up to Rs. 25 lakhs. The appellants point out that only one job worker namely,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f more than Rs. 57 lakhs. She submits that the Commissioner has verified the fact that M/s Dinesh Weaving Mills had exceeded their turnover of more than Rs. 57 lakhs and the interpretation given by the Commissioner that the entire clearances should be taken for fixing the duty is correct. 3. The learned Consultant submits that the Commissioner has not verified any documents and therefore t....
TaxTMI