2009 (7) TMI 942

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sultant, for the Appellant. Shri M. Rastogi, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : M. Veeraiyan, Member (T) (for the Bench) (Oral)]. -  This is an appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) No. GWL/87/2004, dated 24-2-2004. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The appellant is a state government owned company manufacturing footwears and they have sold the products direc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nfirmed differential duty of Rs. 4,435,108/- relating to the period 26-9-1998 to 31-3-1999 along with interest and imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- and the order of the original authority has been confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). 4. After considering the submissions from both the sides and on perusal of the records, we find that the show cause notice clearly refers to MRP having b....