2009 (7) TMI 929
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....one, for the Respondent. [Order per : M. Veeraiyan, Member (T) (Oral)]. - This is an appeal by the Department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) No. 302-CE/APPL/NOIDA/04 dated 30-9-04. 2. Heard the learned SDR and perused record. None appeared for the respondent. 3. There was restriction that the Cenvat earned during a particular fortnight alone can be used....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e 25 for contravention of Rule 8(1) of erstwhile Rules, 2001 for having defaulted the fortnightly payments of Rs. 9,35,760/-. The department is seeking confirmation of duty and penalty as proposed in the show cause notice dated 27-11-2002. 4. It is not disputed that the party has paid the entire amount of duty payable amounting to Rs. 9,36,760/- along with interest though belatedly. Under ....
TaxTMI