2009 (3) TMI 704
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rma, DRs, for the Appellant. Shri Rajesh Chibber, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - None present for the Respondent in Appeal Case No. 400/07 and 404/07 when that was called. Ld. Counsel Shri Rajesh Chibber appeared in Appeal case No. E/828-829/07. All these are filed by Revenue. 2. Ld. DR Shri S.K. Bhaskar appearing for Appeal Case No. 400/07 and Shri R.K. Verm....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... has subscribed his signature does not show whether any material fact was noticed by the Committee to come to a conclusion that the order appealable is neither legal nor proper. A ready-made typed note was made available to him for his signature. The note when perused gives an impression that somebody has suggested him to take decision for filing the appeal. This is clear when the sentence reading....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the past on the board. Once such example is the Appeal case No. 52/07-SM disposed on 24-12-08 by order No. 66/09-SM(BR) in the case of CCE v. M/s. Kurele Chemicals Co. Another instance also before the Bench was on 9-1-09 that is the case in Appeal No. 1844/06-SM (BR) in the case of CCE v. M/s. LML Ltd. Similar such matters were also before the Bench in Appeal Case Nos. 53-54/07-SM(BR) disposed on....
TaxTMI