Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (12) TMI 534

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....asad, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The demand for Rs. 5,59,963/- being excess amount of Cenvat credit availed on capital goods with equal amount of penalty and interest as applicable has been confirmed against the appellants on the ground that 'engraved printing cylinders' falling under Chapter 84 obtained by the appellants should have been treated as capital goods whereas the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mits that the printing cylinder is a consumable and it is useful only for a particular product and for a particular number of runs. Therefore it cannot be said to be a part of machinery even though it falls under Chapter 84. Therefore he submits that on the basis of the above two contentions viz. defacement of invoice and their argument that the cylinder is a consumable, the appellants had a bona ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nded period is invocable. He submits that the appellants were clearly aware that cylinders were capital goods falling under Chapter 84 and hence invocation of misdeclaration/suppression cannot be faulted. 3. After considering rival submissions, I agree with the ld. Advocate for the appellants that extended period could not have been invoked in this case in view of the defacement of the inv....