2008 (12) TMI 527
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....A.K. Mohiddin, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The impugned order affirmed a demand of Rs. 1,46,141/- from M/s. Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Ltd. and a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- imposed on them. The demand is 8%/10% of the price of exempted goods sold during the period November, 2004 to 15 May, 2005, on the ground of the appellants using a common input 'Furnace Oil' for manufacture of d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gines Ltd. v. CCE, Pune reported in 1994 (73) E.L.T. 835 (Tri.). 4. I find that this Tribunal had decided an identical issue in the Final Order No. 1372/08 dated 3-12-08. Para 5 of the above decision is reproduced below : "I have carefully considered the rival submissions. The impugned order was passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) relying on several decisions of the Tribunal. There is ....
TaxTMI