2009 (1) TMI 591

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The impugned order affirmed denial of claim for refund of an amount of Rs. 1,71,965/- filed by the appellants. The appellants had been permitted to pay duty and retain inside the factory a quantity of 1351 MTs of molasses in terms of Rule 173H. The appellants had cleared the quantity allowed to be retained except a quantity of 343.930 MTs which eventuall....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ecisions of the Tribunal : (a)     CCE, Ahmedabad v. Shayona Enterprises - 2008 (230) E.L.T. 378 (Tri.-Ahd.) (b)     Hitech Print Systems v. CC, Chennai - 2008 (230) E.L.T. 288 (Tri.-Chen.) 3. The ld. JDR reiterates the reasoning contained in the impugned order. 4. I have carefully considered the facts of the case and the submissions by....