2008 (11) TMI 508

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Appellant. Shri S.R. Prasad, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After hearing both the sides. We dispense with the condition of pre-deposit and proceed to decide the appeal itself. We find that earlier also the appeals were dismissed by Commissioner (Appeals), for non-compliance with the stay order passed by him. Matter came up before the Tribunal and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that Shri Jayesh Patel deposited the amount on 26-2-2007 i.e. after a delay of around one month. By considering the said delay as a short delay, we condone the same and consider the deposit as have been made in compliance with the Tribunal's order. However, as regards deposits made by second appellant, Shri Viraj P. Shah, we find that though the major part of deposit of Rs. 40,000/- was made on 3-....