Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (9) TMI 792

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant. Shri Manish Kumar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. -  Heard both sides. Shri N. K. Chowdhury, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellants states that the lower appellate authority has rejected the appeal of the appellants on the sole ground that they have not complied with the order of pre-deposit under which the appellants were aske....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rcular No. 21/90/CX-I dated 11-9-90. 2. Heard the ld. DR for the Department who states that the appellants have merely asked for a remand of the appeal and hence the same may be remanded for redecision by the lower appellate authority in the light of the cited Tribunal's decision upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 3. After hearing both sides, we find that the original authority h....