Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (9) TMI 778

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Respondent. [Order per : B.S.V. Murthy, Member (T)]. -  The appellants are engaged independent processors/manufactures of man made fabrics processed falling under Chapter Heading No. 54 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986). They were working under compounded levy scheme during the period from 16-12-98 to 1-3-2000. At the material time, they were required to pay duty u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r. They had accordingly paid the duty on gallery/penal patti amounting to Rs. 14,36,193/- under T.R. 6 challan during the relevant period. 3. In the meanwhile, several decisions of Appellate Tribunal & Larger Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Sangam Processors Bhilwara Ltd. v. CCE, Jaipur reported in 2001 (127) E.L.T. 679 = 2001 (42) RLT 429 ( CEGAT-LB) held that the gallery is not aid....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llery/penal patti of Rs. 14,36,193/- on 1-8-2001 for Rs. 5,79,414/- has been rejected as time barred since the same was not paid under protest. 6. We have considered the submission made by the learned Consultant for the appellants. We find that in this case, the appellant had challenged the provisional assessment which was finalized by the Deputy Commissione and succeeded. It is not disput....